Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
To conduct an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews to provide a contemporary review of the evidence for delivery of cardiac rehabilitation, to identify opportunities for merging or splitting existing Cochrane reviews, and to identify current evidence gaps to inform new cardiac rehabilitation systematic review titles. New review 2014/12
A 2004 editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal noted that Cochrane reviews appear to be more up to date and of better quality than other reviews, describing them as "the best single resource for methodologic research and for developing the science of meta-epidemiology" and crediting them with leading to methodological improvements in the medical literature.
At its core is the collection of Cochrane Reviews, a database of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that summarize and interpret the results of medical research. The Cochrane Library aims to make the results of well-conducted clinical trials readily available and is a key resource in evidence-based medicine .
The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...
The Cochrane Wikipedia Partnership. Cochrane has a commitment to producing and sharing high quality health evidence to as broad an audience as possible. As a way of achieving this, Cochrane has a partnership with Wikipedia with a view to improving the evidence shared in articles, using quality, reliable secondary sources such as recent Cochrane Systematic Reviews to help improve the ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Review category: Reviews on en.Wiki: Total Reviews % on en.Wikipedia Jan 2023 % on en.Wiki Aug 2023: Link to a list of reviews to consider for Wikipedia: Acute Respiratory Infections Group 141 153 92% 95%: Reviews not yet on Wikipedia: Acute Respiratory Infections: Airways Group 106 246 43% 43% Reviews not yet on Wikipedia: Airways: Anaesthesia ...
How to help: Article alerts and resources for editors Articles for cleanup, deletion, and orphaned Patrol recent changes and sort stubs Requested articles. Categories: Project Articles by quality and importance