Ad
related to: physician peer review definition science and research journal articles
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Clinical peer review, also known as medical peer review is the process by which health care professionals, including those in nursing and pharmacy, evaluate each other's clinical performance. [1] [2] A discipline-specific process may be referenced accordingly (e.g., physician peer review, nursing peer review).
Peer-reviewed medical journals are a natural choice as a source for up-to-date medical information in Wikipedia articles. Journal articles come in many different types, and are a mixture of primary and secondary sources. Primary publications describe new research, while review articles summarize and integrate a topic of research into an overall ...
Journal of Medical Biochemistry: Biochemistry: Walter de Gruyter: English: 1982–present Journal of Medical Biography: Medical Personnel: SAGE Publishing: English: 1993–present Journal of Medical Case Reports: Medicine: BioMed Central: English: 2007–present Journal of Medical Economics: Medicine: Taylor and Francis Group: English: 1998 ...
A secondary round of peer review for the clinical value of articles concurrently published in medical journals. [24] Additionally, "medical peer review" has been used by the American Medical Association to refer not only to the process of improving quality and safety in health care organizations, but also to the process of rating clinical ...
Scientific journals contain articles that have been peer reviewed, in an attempt to ensure that articles meet the journal's standards of quality and scientific validity. [1] Although scientific journals are superficially similar to professional magazines (or trade journals), they are actually quite different.
Content usually takes the form of articles presenting original research, review articles, or book reviews.The purpose of an academic journal, according to Henry Oldenburg (the first editor of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), is to give researchers a venue to "impart their knowledge to one another, and contribute what they can to the Grand design of improving natural knowledge ...
There are various general "levels" of scrutiny, which have some effect on the respect given to articles published in the journals. Some broad categories might be editorial review, peer review, and blind peer review. Richard Smith, former editor of the British Medical Journal, stated in 2006 that studies had found peer review to be ineffective ...
The following journals used result-blind peer review or pre-accepted articles: The European Journal of Parapsychology, under Martin Johnson (who proposed a version of Registered Reports in 1974), [113] began accepting papers based on submitted designs and then publishing them, from 1976 to 1993, and published 25 RRs total [98]