When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Nolo contendere - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolo_contendere

    A nolo contendere plea has the same immediate effects as a plea of guilty, but may have different residual effects or consequences in future actions. For instance, a conviction arising from a nolo contendere plea is subject to any and all penalties, fines, and forfeitures of a conviction from a guilty plea in the same case, and can be considered as an aggravating factor in future criminal actions.

  3. Alford plea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alford_plea

    Sources disagree, as may differing states' laws, as to what category of plea the Alford plea falls under: Some sources state that the Alford guilty plea is a form of nolo contendere, where the defendant in the case states "no contest" to the factual matter of the case as given in the charges outlined by the prosecution. [12]

  4. Plea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea

    In law, a plea is a defendant's response to a criminal charge. [1] A defendant may plead guilty or not guilty. Depending on jurisdiction, additional pleas may be available, including nolo contendere (no contest), no case to answer (in the United Kingdom), or an Alford plea (in the United States).

  5. Bar report: Florida Supreme Court disciplines 4 attorneys, 2 ...

    www.aol.com/bar-report-florida-supreme-court...

    He entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charges of attempted burglary of an occupied dwelling, a third-degree felony, and criminal mischief, a first-degree misdemeanor.

  6. Attorney accused of murdering father among 7 lawyers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/attorney-accused-murdering-father...

    Admitted to practice in 2000, Volkman pleaded nolo-contendere to one count of sexual battery on a person 12-18 years by a person in familial custodial authority, a first-degree felony, 20 counts ...

  7. North Carolina v. Alford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_v._Alford

    North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), [1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed that there are no constitutional barriers in place to prevent a judge from accepting a guilty plea from a defendant who wants to plead guilty, while still protesting his innocence, under duress, as a detainee status.

  8. Factual basis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factual_basis

    (a) In accepting a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court should make such inquiry as may be necessary to satisfy itself that there is a factual basis for the plea. As part of its inquiry, the defendant may be asked to state on the record whether he or she agrees with, or in the case of a nolo contendere plea, does not contest, the ...

  9. List of U.S. states by Alford plea usage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by...

    This list of U.S. states by Alford plea usage documents usage of the form of guilty plea known as the Alford plea in each of the U.S. states in the United States. An Alford plea (also referred to as Alford guilty plea [1] [2] [3] and Alford doctrine [4] [5] [6]) in the law of the United States is a guilty plea in criminal court, [7] [8] [9] where the defendant does not admit the act and ...