Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Graphology is the analysis of handwriting in an attempt to determine the writer's personality traits. Its methods and conclusions are not supported by scientific evidence, [ 1 ] [ 2 ] and as such it is considered to be a pseudoscience .
Criticism of pseudoscience, generally by the scientific community or skeptical organizations, involves critiques of the logical, methodological, or rhetorical bases of the topic in question. [1] Though some of the listed topics continue to be investigated scientifically, others were only subject to scientific research in the past and today are ...
The history of pseudoscience is the study of pseudoscientific theories over time. A pseudoscience is a set of ideas that presents itself as science, while it does not meet the criteria to be properly called such. [38] [39] Distinguishing between proper science and pseudoscience is sometimes difficult. [40]
Graphology, pseudoscience involving analysis of handwriting in an attempt to determine the writer's personality traits; Palaeography, study of historical writing systems; Questioned document examination, examination of handwriting to assess potential authorship of a piece of evidence in a legal proceeding
Some theories originate in, or are perpetuated by, pseudoscience, which claims to be both scientific and factual, but fails to follow the scientific method. Scientific theories are testable and make falsifiable predictions. [2]
Phrenology is a pseudoscience that involves the measurement of bumps on the skull to predict mental traits. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] It is based on the concept that the brain is the organ of the mind, and that certain brain areas have localized, specific functions or modules. [ 3 ]
Ed Regis, writing in The New York Times, considered the book to be "the classic put-down of pseudoscience". [20] Fellow skeptic Michael Shermer called the book "the skeptic classic of the past half-century." He noted that the mark of popularity for the book came when John W. Campbell denounced the chapter on dianetics over the radio. [1]
2) There probably is a scientific basis to Graphology, otherwise there would be no scientific basis to psychological tests like the Rorschach, which stress the importance of the subconscious. 3) Graphology may not be a pseudoscience, but it has not been researched and standardized enough to be raised to the level of a science.