When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California Courts of Appeal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Courts_of_Appeal

    The Comerica Bank Tower, which houses the Sixth District's courthouse. The California Court of Appeal for the Sixth District is located in the Comerica Bank building in San Jose. Its jurisdiction covers Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz Counties. [1] It has seven justices. Justices: Mary J. Greenwood, Administrative Presiding ...

  3. Private Attorneys General Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Attorneys_General_Act

    Staples the Office Superstore, LLC (2021), California's Second District Court of Appeal held that "courts have inherent authority to ensure that PAGA claims can be fairly and efficiently tried and, if necessary, may strike claims that cannot be rendered manageable."

  4. Yorty v. Chandler - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yorty_v._Chandler

    Chandler, 13 Cal.App.3d 467 (1970), was a decision by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District involving how strictly an editorial cartoon needed to be interpreted in lawsuits for libel. It is a significant decision in the case law of applying the First Amendment to editorial cartoons and has been cited as a persuasive authority by other U ...

  5. Payment card interchange fee and merchant discount antitrust ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_Card_Interchange...

    The docket number is 05-md-01720. The United States District Court in the Eastern District of New York in Brooklyn is the venue. [9] The case is more commonly known as Swipeopoly, [26] in reference to the alleged Visa and Mastercard duopoly over the payments network. Other variations include the Swipeopoly [27] Settlement and the Swipe Fee Scandal.

  6. Last-minute appeals court ruling widely limits concealed ...

    www.aol.com/last-minute-appeals-court-ruling...

    “Sensitive places” include stores, restaurants, parks, churches and other common areas.

  7. Peruta v. San Diego County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peruta_v._San_Diego_County

    Peruta v. San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 26150, 26155) before issuing a ...

  8. Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specht_v._Netscape...

    Netscape, 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002), [1] is a ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the enforceability of clickwrap licenses under contract law. The court held that merely clicking on a download button does not show consent with license terms, if those terms were not conspicuous and if it was not ...

  9. California appeals court reverses most of ruling deeming Prop ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-appeals-court...

    A California appeals court has upheld most of Proposition 22, a 2020 ballot measure that treats drivers for ride-hailing and food-delivery companies as independent contractors rather than employees.