When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Quasi-contract - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-contract

    A quasi-contract (or implied-in-law contract or constructive contract) is a fictional contract recognised by a court. The notion of a quasi-contract can be traced to Roman law and is still a concept used in some modern legal systems. Quasi contract laws have been deduced from the Latin statement "Nemo debet locupletari ex aliena iactura", which ...

  3. Lucy v. Zehmer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_v._Zehmer

    The mental assent of the parties is not requisite for the formation of a contract. If the words or other acts of one of the parties have but one reasonable meaning, his undisclosed intention is immaterial except when an unreasonable meaning which he attaches to his manifestations is known to the other party.

  4. United States contract law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_contract_law

    There are two types of quasi-contract. One is an action in restitution. The other is unjust enrichment. Note, therefore, that it is improper to say that quasi-contract, implied in law contract, and unjust enrichment are all synonymous, because unjust enrichment is only one type of the broader category of quasi-contracts (contracts implied in ...

  5. G. L. Christian and Associates v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._L._Christian_and...

    The Army Corps of Engineers signed a contract with G.L. Christian and Associates to build 2,000 housing units for soldiers at Fort Polk, Louisiana, under the "Capehart Act". Fort Polk was deactivated by the Department of the Army in 1958, and the $32.9 million construction contract was terminated by the Corps of Engineers on February 5, 1958 ...

  6. Failure of consideration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failure_of_consideration

    Where there is a "total failure of consideration" the claimant can seek restitution of the benefit by bringing an action in unjust enrichment against the defendant. Historically speaking, this was as a quasi-contractual claim known as an action for money had and received to the plaintiff's use for a consideration

  7. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_&_Youngs,_Inc._v._Kent

    Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent, 230 N.Y. 239 (1921) is an American contract law case of the New York Court of Appeals with a majority opinion by Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo.The case addresses several contract principles including applying the doctrine of substantial performance in preventing forfeiture and determining the appropriate remedy following a partial or defective performance.

  8. DirecTV users lose access to ESPN, ABC and other Disney ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/directv-users-lose-access-espn...

    DirecTV and Disney failed to reach an agreement over the weekend, causing Disney to remove channels from the platform. Learn how to get a credit if you're a DirecTV customer.

  9. English unjust enrichment law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_unjust_enrichment_law

    The modern law of unjust enrichment encompasses what was once known as the law of quasi-contract. Its precise scope remains a matter of controversy. [1] Beyond quasi-contract, it is sometimes said to encompass the law relating to subrogation, contribution, recoupment, and claims to the traceable substitutes of misapplied property.