Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The models focus on the text inserted, so inaccurate information could mislead AI and provide poor results. Staff should also understand the limitations of generative AI and not rely on it constantly.
The report also asserts that generative AI is both altering the current scope of existing human rights risks associated with digital technologies (including earlier forms of AI) and has unique ...
The letter highlights both the positive and negative effects of artificial intelligence. [7] According to Bloomberg Business, Professor Max Tegmark of MIT circulated the letter in order to find common ground between signatories who consider super intelligent AI a significant existential risk, and signatories such as Professor Oren Etzioni, who believe the AI field was being "impugned" by a one ...
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter is the title of a letter published by the Future of Life Institute in March 2023. The letter calls "all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4", citing risks such as AI-generated propaganda, extreme automation of jobs, human obsolescence, and a society-wide loss of control. [1]
Concern over risk from artificial intelligence has led to some high-profile donations and investments. In 2015, Peter Thiel, Amazon Web Services, and Musk and others jointly committed $1 billion to OpenAI, consisting of a for-profit corporation and the nonprofit parent company, which says it aims to champion responsible AI development. [124]
In May, Musk responded to a Breitbart article on X quoting Nobel Prize winner Geoffrey Hinton’s warnings about the dangers of AI. And he reiterated his warning about AI during the summit this week.
In a new interview, AI expert Kai-Fu Lee explained the top four dangers of burgeoning AI technology: externalities, personal data risks, inability to explain consequential choices, and warfare.
Skeptics of the letter point out that AI has failed to reach certain milestones, such as predictions around self-driving cars. [4] Skeptics also argue that signatories of the letter were continuing funding of AI research. [3] Companies would benefit from public perception that AI algorithms were far more advanced than currently possible. [3]