Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
We conclude, based on our review of the articles in this special issue and the broader literature, that it is time to stop using the term "statistically significant" entirely. Nor should variants such as "significantly different," " p ≤ 0.05 {\displaystyle p\leq 0.05} ," and "nonsignificant" survive, whether expressed in words, by asterisks ...
It complements hypothesis testing approaches such as null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), by going beyond the question is an effect present or not, and provides information about how large an effect is. [2] [3] Estimation statistics is sometimes referred to as the new statistics. [3] [4] [5]
A result is said to be statistically significant if it allows us to reject the null hypothesis. All other things being equal, smaller p-values are taken as stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. Loosely speaking, rejection of the null hypothesis implies that there is sufficient evidence against it.
The table shown on the right can be used in a two-sample t-test to estimate the sample sizes of an experimental group and a control group that are of equal size, that is, the total number of individuals in the trial is twice that of the number given, and the desired significance level is 0.05. [4]
The 0.05 significance level is merely a convention. [3] [5] The 0.05 significance level (alpha level) is often used as the boundary between a statistically significant and a statistically non-significant p-value. However, this does not imply that there is generally a scientific reason to consider results on opposite sides of any threshold as ...
Under a frequentist hypothesis testing framework, this is done by calculating a test statistic (such as a t-statistic) for the dataset, which has a known theoretical probability distribution if there is no difference (the so called null hypothesis). If the actual value calculated on the sample is sufficiently unlikely to arise under the null ...
[4] [14] [15] [16] The apparent contradiction stems from the combination of a discrete statistic with fixed significance levels. [17] [18] Consider the following proposal for a significance test at the 5%-level: reject the null hypothesis for each table to which Fisher's test assigns a p-value equal to or smaller than 5%. Because the set of all ...
Much of statistical theory revolves around the minimization of one or both of these errors, though the complete elimination of either is an impossibility if the outcome is not determined by a known, observable causal process. The knowledge of type I errors and type II errors is widely used in medical science, biometrics and computer science.