Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A Coach's Guide to Developing Exemplary Leaders: Making the Most of The Leadership Challenge and the Leadership Practices Inventory. Hoboken: Pfeiffer (2010) Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People Demand It. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass (1993). A Leader's Legacy. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass (2006). ISBN 9780787982966
Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...
She is currently Professor of Leadership at Harvard Business School. [2] [3] Edmondson is the author of seven books and more than 75 articles and case studies. [4] She is best known for her pioneering work on psychological safety, which has helped spawn a large body of academic research in management, healthcare and education over the past 15 ...
[citation needed] In August, 2007, Business Week ranked him as one of the top ten thought leaders in business. [ 12 ] [ 13 ] His work On Becoming a Leader , originally published in 1989, lays the foundation that a leader must be authentic, i.e. author of one's own creation; [ 14 ] a combination of experience, self-knowledge, and personal ethics.
The difference leaders make is not always positive in nature. Leaders sometimes focus on fulfilling their own agendas at the expense of others, including their own followers. Leaders who focus on personal gain by employing stringent and manipulative leadership styles often make a difference, but usually do so through negative means. [174]
Authentic leadership, while having no formal or unequivocal definition, is a growing field in academic research. [1] The idea has also been embraced by leaders and leadership coaches, who view it as an alternative to leaders who emphasize profit and share price over people and ethics.
Research integrity or scientific integrity is an aspect of research ethics that deals with best practice or rules of professional practice of scientists.. First introduced in the 19th century by Charles Babbage, the concept of research integrity came to the fore in the late 1970s.
Integrity is the quality of being honest and showing a consistent and uncompromising adherence to strong moral and ethical principles and values. [1] [2] In ethics, integrity is regarded as the honesty and truthfulness or earnestness of one's actions. Integrity can stand in opposition to hypocrisy. [3]