Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
(A reflection would not preserve handedness; for instance, it would transform a left hand into a right hand.) To avoid ambiguity, a transformation that preserves handedness is known as a rigid motion, a Euclidean motion, or a proper rigid transformation. In dimension two, a rigid motion is either a translation or a rotation.
A rotation of axes in more than two dimensions is defined similarly. [2] [3] A rotation of axes is a linear map [4] [5] and a rigid transformation. Motivation
The continuous trajectories in E(3) play an important role in classical mechanics, because they describe the physically possible movements of a rigid body in three-dimensional space over time. One takes f (0) to be the identity transformation I of E 3 {\displaystyle \mathbb {E} ^{3}} , which describes the initial position of the body.
Then reflect P′ to its image P′′ on the other side of line L 2. If lines L 1 and L 2 make an angle θ with one another, then points P and P′′ will make an angle 2θ around point O, the intersection of L 1 and L 2. I.e., angle ∠ POP′′ will measure 2θ. A pair of rotations about the same point O will be equivalent to another ...
The position of an n-dimensional rigid body is defined by the rigid transformation, [T] = [A, d], where d is an n-dimensional translation and A is an n × n rotation matrix, which has n translational degrees of freedom and n(n − 1)/2 rotational degrees of freedom.
A strictly convex polyhedral framework whose -skeleton is rigid. Corollary. The 2-skeleton of a strictly convex polyhedral framework in -dimensions is rigid. In other words, if we treat the convex polyhedra as a set of rigid plates, i.e., as a variant of a body-bar-hinge framework, then the framework is rigid.
A reflection in a line is an opposite isometry, like R 1 or R 2 on the image. Translation T is a direct isometry: a rigid motion. [1] In mathematics, an isometry (or congruence, or congruent transformation) is a distance-preserving transformation between metric spaces, usually assumed to be bijective.
The sum of the entries along the main diagonal (the trace), plus one, equals 4 − 4(x 2 + y 2 + z 2), which is 4w 2. Thus we can write the trace itself as 2 w 2 + 2 w 2 − 1 ; and from the previous version of the matrix we see that the diagonal entries themselves have the same form: 2 x 2 + 2 w 2 − 1 , 2 y 2 + 2 w 2 − 1 , and 2 z 2 + 2 w ...