Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, No. 17-647, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with compensation for private property owners when the use of that property is taken from them by state or local governments, under the Due Process Clause and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
United States in 1933, deciding that the Court of Claims was an Article I or legislative court and so Congress had the authority to reduce the salaries of the judges of the Court of Claims. [ 7 ] Beginning in 1948, Congress directed that when directed by the court, the commissioner could make recommendations for conclusions of law (62 Stat. 976 ).
The United States Court of Federal Claims (in case citations, Fed. Cl. or C.F.C.) is a United States federal court that hears monetary claims against the U.S. government.It was established by statute in 1982 as the United States Claims Court, and took its current name in 1992.
The decision means that officials can no longer add last-minute votes or discussion topics without first notifying taxpayers. Pa. court sides with transparency. How to know if your local gov't is ...
The 2-1 decision by a three-judge panel reversed a Nov. 21 decision by U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, of the Erie Division of the Pittsburgh-based U.S. District Court for the Western ...
Supreme Court of the United States 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Established March 4, 1789 ; 235 years ago (1789-03-04) Location Washington, D.C. Coordinates 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Composition method Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation Authorised by ...
The difference of prosecution and judicial opinions across Pennsylvania centers on the language of unlawful contact with a minor. The statute requires a law enforcement posing as a minor or an ...
State officials appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which reversed the Commonwealth Court's decision because the statutes did not set minimum distances for observers. The Trump campaign appealed to the United States Supreme Court on December 20, 2020, but this was dismissed without comment. [20] [21] [22] November 10, 2020: Pirkle v. Wolf