When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: state v cohen case brief

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cohen v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._California

    Cohen v. California , 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "Fuck the Draft " in the public corridors of a California courthouse.

  3. Cohens v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohens_v._virginia

    Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 264 (1821), is a landmark case by the Supreme Court of the United States that is most notable for the Court's assertion of its power to review state supreme court decisions in criminal law matters if defendants claim that their constitutional rights have been violated. [1]

  4. Irwin Schiff - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Schiff

    Schiff in 1980. Irwin Allen Schiff (/ ʃ ɪ f /; February 23, 1928 – October 16, 2015) was an American libertarian and tax resistance advocate [1] known for writing and promoting literature in which he argued that the way in which the income tax in the United States is enforced upon individuals as a tax on one's time or wages, is illegal and unconstitutional.

  5. Massachusetts v. Mellon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._Mellon

    Frothingham v. Mellon, 288 F. 252 (D.C. Cir. 1923) Flast v. Cohen (1968) (in part) Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court rejected the concept of taxpayer standing. [1] The case was consolidated with Frothingham v. Mellon. The plaintiffs in the cases, Frothingham and Massachusetts ...

  6. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire

    Murphy, joined by unanimous. Laws applied. U.S. Constitution amend. I; NH P. L., c. 378, § 2 (1941) Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in which the Court articulated the fighting words doctrine, a limitation of the First Amendment 's guarantee of freedom of speech.

  7. Loving v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

    Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1][2] Beginning in 2013, the decision was cited as precedent in U.S. federal court ...

  8. United States v. O'Brien - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._O'Brien

    United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court, ruling that a criminal prohibition against burning a draft card did not violate the First Amendment 's guarantee of free speech. Though the court recognized that O'Brien's conduct was expressive as a protest against the Vietnam War, it ...

  9. Cohen v. Brown University - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._Brown_University

    The case of Cohen v.Brown University challenged cost-cutting efforts Brown University made in 1991 that targeted women's sports and women's interest in sports. Women's volleyball and gymnastics teams were demoted from university-funded varsity status to donor-funded club varsity status, along with the men's water polo and golf teams.

  1. Ad

    related to: state v cohen case brief