When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ohio v. Robinette - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Robinette

    Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car.

  3. List of Terry stop case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Terry_stop_case_law

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) — incorporated exclusionary rule against the states; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — stop and frisk for weapons OK for officer safety; Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968) — companion case to Terry. Peters v. New York (1968) — companion case to Terry contained in Sibron

  4. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.

  5. Traffic stop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_stop

    A traffic stop, colloquially referred to as being pulled over, is a temporary detention of a driver of a vehicle and its occupants by police to investigate a possible crime or minor violation of law. United States

  6. Terry stop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

    When police stop and search a pedestrian, this is commonly known as a stop and frisk. When police stop an automobile, this is known as a traffic stop. If the police stop a motor vehicle on minor infringements in order to investigate other suspected criminal activity, this is known as a pretextual stop. Additional rules apply to stops that occur ...

  7. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    "Stop and identify" laws in different states that appear to be nearly identical may be different in effect because of interpretations by state courts. For example, California "stop and identify" law, Penal Code §647(e) had wording [37] [38] [39] similar to the Nevada law upheld in Hiibel, but a California appellate court, in People v.

  8. Officers find suspected drugs during in traffic stop on Ohio 751

    www.aol.com/officers-suspected-drugs-during...

    COSHOCTON − The Coshocton County Sheriff's Office conducted a traffic stop that resulted in a drug bust at 11:35 p.m. Wednesday in the 22000 block of Ohio 751 in Lafayette Township.. The ...

  9. List of consent to search case law articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_consent_to_search...

    Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990) - search valid if police reasonably believe consent given by owner; Florida v. Bostick (1991) - not "free to leave" but "free to decline" on bus; Florida v. Jimeno (1991) - can request officer to limit scope of search; Ohio v. Robinette (1996) - do not have to inform motorist is free to go; United States v.