When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: direct vs indirect evidence examples sentences grammar

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Negative evidence in language acquisition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_evidence_in...

    Direct negative evidence in language acquisition consists of utterances that indicate whether a construction in a language is ungrammatical. [1] Direct negative evidence differs from indirect negative evidence because it is explicitly presented to a language learner (e.g. a child might be corrected by a parent). Direct negative evidence can be ...

  3. Direct negative evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Negative_Evidence

    Direct negative evidence differs from indirect negative evidence in that it is explicitly presented to a language learner (for example, a child might be corrected by a parent) whereas indirect negative evidence is inferred from the absence of ungrammatical utterances in a given language.

  4. Evidentiality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidentiality

    Evidentiality may be direct or indirect: direct evidentials are used to describe information directly perceived by the speaker through vision as well as other sensory experiences while indirect evidentials consist of the other grammatical markers for evidence such as quotatives and inferentials.

  5. Indirect speech - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_speech

    The indirect speech sentence is then ambiguous since it can be a result of two different direct speech sentences. For example: I can get it for free. OR I could get it for free. He said that he could get it for free. (ambiguity) However, in many Slavic languages, there is no change of tense in indirect speech and so there is no ambiguity.

  6. Grammatical relation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_relation

    The subject is the agent Marge in the first sentence and the patient The coffee table in the second sentence. The direct object is the patient the coffee table in the first sentence, and there is no direct object in the second sentence. The situation is similar with the ergative verb sunk/sink in the second pair of

  7. Object (grammar) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_(grammar)

    In linguistics, an object is any of several types of arguments. [1] In subject-prominent, nominative-accusative languages such as English, a transitive verb typically distinguishes between its subject and any of its objects, which can include but are not limited to direct objects, [2] indirect objects, [3] and arguments of adpositions (prepositions or postpositions); the latter are more ...