Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The new Decision upheld sec. 4(a) of Resolution 8678, sec. 13 of R.A. 9369 and sec. 66 of the Omnibus Election Code. Nine other justices adopted Justice Puno’s view that these provisions satisfy the requisites of the equal protection test, especially the second requirement that it must be germane to the purposes of the law.
Section 69 of the Omnibus Election Code states that a nuisance candidate is someone who has filed a certificate of candidacy with the intention of: [1] putting the election process in mockery or disrepute; causing confusion among voters by the similarity of their name to other registered candidates
Special elections to the 104th United States Congress ... Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995; P. ... Code of Conduct;
The bitter battles over election legislation spurred by the 2020 election came to fruition on Thursday when lawmakers voted in favor of passing Senate ... UPDATE: Kemp signs sweeping elections ...
During the 2004 United States elections, there was controversy around various aspects of the voting process, including whether voting had been made accessible to all those entitled to vote, whether ineligible voters were registered, whether voters were registered multiple times, and whether the votes cast had been correctly counted.
To amend section 61h-6 of title 2, United States Code. Pub. L. 104–2 (text) 104-3: March 7, 1995 (No short title) To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars to make eligible for membership those veterans that have served within the territorial limits of South Korea. Pub. L. 104–3 (text) 104-4: March 22, 1995
This chapter deals with elections for President every four years, and vacancies. Chapter 1: Presidential Elections and Vacancies § 1. Time of appointing electors § 2. Repealed § 3. Number of electors § 4. Vacancies in electoral college § 5. Certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors § 6. Duties of Archivist § 7. Meeting and ...
Davis v. Federal Election Commission, 554 U.S. 724 (2008), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that section 319 (popularly known as the "Millionaire's Amendment") of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (popularly known as the McCain-Feingold law) unconstitutionally infringed on candidates' rights as provided by First Amendment.