When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Free will theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will_theorem

    The free will theorem states: Given the axioms, if the choice about what measurement to take is not a function of the information accessible to the experimenters (free will assumption), then the results of the measurements cannot be determined by anything previous to the experiments. That is an "outcome open" theorem:

  3. List of theorems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_theorems

    Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups (functional analysis) Stone–Tukey theorem ; Stone–von Neumann theorem (functional analysis, representation theory of the Heisenberg group, quantum mechanics) Stone–Weierstrass theorem (functional analysis) Strassmann's theorem (field theory) Strong perfect graph theorem (graph theory)

  4. List of axioms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_axioms

    This is a list of axioms as that term is understood in mathematics. In epistemology , the word axiom is understood differently; see axiom and self-evidence . Individual axioms are almost always part of a larger axiomatic system .

  5. Free will - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will

    These questions predate the early Greek stoics (for example, Chrysippus), and some modern philosophers lament the lack of progress over all these centuries. [11] [12] On one hand, humans have a strong sense of freedom, which leads them to believe that they have free will. [13] [14] On the other hand, an intuitive feeling of free will could be ...

  6. Whitney embedding theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitney_embedding_theorem

    ⁠ Whitney's strong embedding theorem states that e(n) ≤ 2n. For n = 1, 2 we have e(n) = 2n, as the circle and the Klein bottle show. More generally, for n = 2 k we have e(n) = 2n, as the 2 k-dimensional real projective space show. Whitney's result can be improved to e(n) ≤ 2n − 1 unless n is a power of 2.

  7. Fermat pseudoprime - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_pseudoprime

    Unlike the list above, that page excludes the bases 1 and n−1. When p is a prime, p 2 is a Fermat pseudoprime to base b if and only if p is a Wieferich prime to base b. For example, 1093 2 = 1194649 is a Fermat pseudoprime to base 2, and 11 2 = 121 is a Fermat pseudoprime to base 3.

  8. Incompatibilism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incompatibilism

    [35]: 247-248 The free will theorem of John H. Conway and Simon B. Kochen further establishes that if we have free will, then quantum particles also possess free will. [ 36 ] [ 37 ] This means that starting from the assumption that humans have free will, it is possible to pinpoint the origin of their free will in the quantum particles that ...

  9. Simply typed lambda calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simply_typed_lambda_calculus

    In the 1930s Alonzo Church sought to use the logistic method: [a] his lambda calculus, as a formal language based on symbolic expressions, consisted of a denumerably infinite series of axioms and variables, [b] but also a finite set of primitive symbols, [c] denoting abstraction and scope, as well as four constants: negation, disjunction, universal quantification, and selection respectively ...