Ads
related to: research paper peer review template- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Essay Checker
Proofread your essay with ease.
Writing that makes the grade.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Free Writing Assistant
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Free Sentence Checker
Free online proofreading tool.
Find and fix errors quickly.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
To request a Peer review, edit the article talk page, add {} to the top of the page, and save the page. This will create this template ({{Peer review}}) with a link to a new peer review page for the article. Follow this link, and add your request in the edit box as instructed.
To start a new peer review, add {} to the article talk page, and follow the link this produces to create a peer review page for the article. The edit box will already contain the peer review page template, but with the topic blank. Feel free to fill in the topic as above.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
This template is to be used on main pages and talk pages of articles that have been though academic peer review and published in whole or in part in an academic journal. The template dislays differently when included on a main vs talkpage (see examples below) and for whether the article was adapted from wikipedia initially ( W2J ) or written ...
This page documents a template used by Wikipedia:Peer Review. For how editors use peer reviews, see WP:PR/Instructions . For an overview of the technical process, see Wikipedia:Peer review/Tools .
Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...