Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007), was a United States Supreme Court case that clarified how federal courts of appeals should implement the remedy for the Sixth Amendment violation identified in United States v.
So, in Foxall v International Land Credit Co, [2] it was left by the same learned judge to the jury to say what was a reasonable notice in the case of a clerk. In the present case, the hiring was not an ordinary hiring for a year.
A unanimous opinion is one in which all of the justices agree and offer one rationale for their decision. A majority opinion is a judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the members of a court. A majority opinion sets forth the decision of the court and an explanation of the rationale behind the court's decision.
Since we started at 50-50, we now have 23 Democratic voters and 37 Republican voters left. With the same 10 percent drop off, Democrats get 21 votes on Election Day and Republicans get 33. The ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Dennis M. Powell, opinion contributor. September 14, 2024 at 1:00 PM ... On Day One, he decided to transform the economy around green energy and restructure our society to achieve social justice ...
The reasonable expectation of privacy is crucial in distinguishing a legitimate, reasonable police search and seizure from an unreasonable one. A "search" occurs for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when the Government violates a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy". [3] In Katz v.
Don Wolfensberger, opinion contributor January 16, 2025 at 2:30 PM I recounted last week the brutal battle to elect a House Speaker on the opening day of the 119th Congress (Jan. 3, 2025).