Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Therefore, HTTP/1.1 added status codes 303 and 307 to distinguish between the two behaviours. [1]: §15.4 303 See Other (since HTTP/1.1) The response to the request can be found under another URI using the GET method. When received in response to a POST (or PUT/DELETE), the client should presume that the server has received the data and should ...
This is a list of Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) response status codes. Status codes are issued by a server in response to a client's request made to the server. Unless otherwise stated, all status codes described here is part of the current SMTP standard, RFC 5321. The message phrases shown are typical, but any human-readable alternative ...
Command protection level denied for policy reasons. 534: Request denied for policy reasons. 535: Failed security check. 536: Data protection level not supported by security mechanism. 537: Command protection level not supported by security mechanism. 550: Requested action not taken. File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access). 551 ...
When you get a message from a "MAILER-DAEMON" or a "Mail Delivery Subsystem" with a subject similar to "Failed Delivery," this means that an email you sent was undeliverable and has been bounced back to you.
[1]: §7.2 The SIP response codes are consistent with the HTTP response codes, although not all HTTP response codes are valid in SIP. [1]: §21 SIP responses also specify a "reason phrase", and a default reason phrase is defined with each response code. [1]: §7.2 These reason phrases can be varied, however, such as to provide additional ...
Although the SMTP is a mature technology, counting more than thirty years, its architecture is increasingly strained by both normal and unsolicited load. [2] The email systems have been enhanced with reputation systems tied to the actual sender of the email, with the idea of recipient's email servers rejecting the email when a forged sender is used in the protocol.
Chunked transfer encoding is a streaming data transfer mechanism available in Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) version 1.1, defined in RFC 9112 §7.1. In chunked transfer encoding, the data stream is divided into a series of non-overlapping "chunks". The chunks are sent out and received independently of one another.
Here, attempting to use a non-class type in a qualified name (T::foo) results in a deduction failure for f<int> because int has no nested type named foo, but the program is well-formed because a valid function remains in the set of candidate functions.