Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Articles on this list should be checked from time to time to monitor developments in the presentation of the issues. Use the "related changes" link to quickly review changes to these articles. Discussions about those controversies should be limited to the relevant Talk pages. For more information, see Wikipedia:Controversial articles.
Despite being promoted as an encyclopedia "anyone can edit", the ability to edit controversial pages is sometimes restricted because of "edit wars" or vandalism. [13] To address criticism about restricting access while minimizing malicious editing of those pages, Wikipedia has also tried measures such as "pending changes protection" which allows open editing of contentious articles, with the ...
An article about a controversial person, issue, group or organization should start with facts: "According to the FBI, the XYZ faction had over 1,000 active members in 1982. [1] ". Next, the article should accurately describe their views, no matter how misguided or repugnant.
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 18 September 2024. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...
Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Ideological bias on Wikipedia, especially in its English-language edition, has been the subject of academic analysis and public criticism of the project. Questions relate to whether its content is biased due to the political, religious, or other ideologies its volunteer editors may adhere to.
Edit wars are prohibited on Wikipedia [8]: 146 and editors are encouraged to seek consensus through discussion, however administrative intervention may be applied if discussion is unfruitful in resolving the conflict. [9] Generally, edit wars are provoked by the presence of highly controversial content, [5] such as abortion or the Israeli ...
Later, the article was restored by another Wikipedia contributor who lived outside France, in Switzerland. [128] [129] As a result of the controversy, the article became the most read page on the French Wikipedia, [130] with over 120,000 page views during the weekend of 6–7 April 2013. [131] It was translated into multiple other languages. [132]
Wikipedia coverage of Donald Trump has been a subject of controversy, largely on the English-language version, since 2015 after he launched his ultimately successful 2016 United States presidential campaign. Trump 's Wikipedia article and related pages have sparked debate between Wikipedia editors, and have also often been vandalized.