Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In statistics, gambler's ruin is the fact that a gambler playing a game with negative expected value will eventually go bankrupt, regardless of their betting system.. The concept was initially stated: A persistent gambler who raises his bet to a fixed fraction of the gambler's bankroll after a win, but does not reduce it after a loss, will eventually and inevitably go broke, even if each bet ...
Risk of ruin is a concept in gambling, insurance, and finance relating to the likelihood of losing all one's investment capital or extinguishing one's bankroll below the minimum for further play. [1] For instance, if someone bets all their money on a simple coin toss, the risk of ruin is 50%.
Statistical inference might be thought of as gambling theory applied to the world around us. The myriad applications for logarithmic information measures tell us precisely how to take the best guess in the face of partial information. [1] In that sense, information theory might be considered a formal expression of the theory of gambling. It is ...
This result has many names: the level-crossing phenomenon, recurrence or the gambler's ruin. The reason for the last name is as follows: a gambler with a finite amount of money will eventually lose when playing a fair game against a bank with an infinite amount of money. The gambler's money will perform a random walk, and it will reach zero at ...
It is a function of the gambler's total wealth w, and the concept of diminishing marginal utility of money is built into it. The expected utility hypothesis posits that a utility function exists that provides a good criterion for real people's behavior; i.e. a function that returns a positive or negative value indicating if the wager is a good ...
Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM
Because the ICM ignores player skill, the classical gambler's ruin problem also models the omitted poker games, but more precisely. Harville-Malmuth's formulas only coincide with gambler's-ruin estimates in the 2-player case. [9] With 3 or more players, they give misleading probabilities, but adequately approximate the expected payout. [10]
Then the gambler's fortune over time is a martingale, and the time τ at which he decides to quit (or goes broke and is forced to quit) is a stopping time. So the theorem says that E[X τ] = E[X 0]. In other words, the gambler leaves with the same amount of money on average as when he started. (The same result holds if the gambler, instead of ...