Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The inverse of the Ackermann function appears in some time complexity results. For instance, the disjoint-set data structure takes amortized time per operation proportional to the inverse Ackermann function, [24] and cannot be made faster within the cell-probe model of computational complexity. [25]
For a sequence of m addition, union, or find operations on a disjoint-set forest with n nodes, the total time required is O(mα(n)), where α(n) is the extremely slow-growing inverse Ackermann function. Although disjoint-set forests do not guarantee this time per operation, each operation rebalances the structure (via tree compression) so that ...
These operations take amortized time O(α(V)) time per operation, giving worst-case total time O(E α(V)) for this loop, where α is the extremely slowly growing inverse Ackermann function. This part of the time bound is much smaller than the time for the sorting step, so the total time for the algorithm can be simplified to the time for the ...
The pseudocode below determines the lowest common ancestor of each pair in P, given the root r of a tree in which the children of node n are in the set n.children.For this offline algorithm, the set P must be specified in advance.
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Inverse Ackermann function
In other words, the Ackermann hierarchy and the Goodstein hierarchy (if calling things by authors is what you care about) are completely distinct families of binary operations, even though they are both defined by (,,) = (,, (,,)), the initial conditions make them different.
This work is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or any later version. This work is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but without any warranty; without even the implied ...
In mathematics and logic, Ackermann set theory (AST, also known as / [1]) is an axiomatic set theory proposed by Wilhelm Ackermann in 1956. [2] AST differs from Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZF) in that it allows proper classes, that is, objects that are not sets, including a class of all sets. It replaces several of the standard ZF axioms for ...