Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
v. t. e. Price fixing is an anticompetitive agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand. The intent of price fixing may be to push the price ...
A federal district court in February 1961 fined 29 electrical manufacturing companies and 45 individuals a total of $1,924,500 for violating the antitrust laws by fixing prices and rigging bids on heavy electrical equipment, some of which was sold to the Government. [46] (. See also: Allis-Chalmers § 1960s and 1970s.)
Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287 (1948), [1] is a decision of the United States Supreme Court limiting the doctrine of the 1926 General Electric decision, excusing price fixing in patent license agreements. [2] The Line Material Court held that cross-licenses between two manufacturer competitors, providing for fixing the prices of the licensed ...
Sherman Act 1890 § 1 Preventing collusion and cartels that act in restraint of trade is an essential task of antitrust law. It reflects the view that each business has a duty to act independently on the market, and so earn its profits solely by providing better priced and quality products than its competitors. The Sherman Act §1 prohibits "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust ...
Here's how it started: In January 2022, a suit was filed in federal court in Illinois, claiming that 16 elite schools came together to devise a price-fixing arrangement through which they would ...
Roberts, joined by McReynolds. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 (1940), [1] is a 1940 United States Supreme Court decision widely cited for the proposition that price-fixing is illegal per se. [2] The Socony case was, at least until recently, the most widely cited case on price fixing. [3]
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 (Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States) 63–212, 38 Stat. 730, enacted October 15, 1914, codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 12–27, 29 U.S.C. §§ 52–53), is a part of United States antitrust law with the goal of adding further substance to the U.S. antitrust law regime; the Clayton Act seeks to prevent anticompetitive practices in their incipiency.
Commerce Clause. Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Commerce Clause allowed the federal government to regulate monopolies if it has a direct effect on commerce. It marked the success of the Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt in destroying the " Beef Trust ".