Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) [1] was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school district policy that required the teaching of intelligent design (ID), ultimately found by the court to not be science.
Taney Court (March 28, 1836 – October 12, 1864) Chase Court (December 15, 1864 – May 7, 1873) Waite Court (March 4, 1874 – March 23, 1888) Fuller Court (October 8, 1888 – July 4, 1910) White Court (December 19, 1910 – May 19, 1921) Taft Court (July 11, 1921 – February 3, 1930)
Delligatti v. United States. 23-825. Whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force. June 3, 2024. (November 12, 2024) Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc. 23-900.
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) Set the standard for what parties must establish in evidence to be granted summary judgement in federal civil cases and how courts should evaluate those motions. Since such motions are extremely common, Anderson has become the most-cited Supreme Court case. Daubert v.
This is a list of volumes of U.S. Reports, and the links point to the contents of each individual volume. Each volume was edited by one of the Reporters of Decisions of the Supreme Court. As of the beginning of the October 2019 Term, there were 574 bound volumes of the U.S. Reports. There were another 14 volumes worth of opinions available as ...
October 4, 2024 at 2:11 PM. By Daniel Wiessner. (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether it should be more difficult for workers from "majority backgrounds," such as ...
October 7, 2024 at 6:22 AM. By John Kruzel, Andrew Chung. WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Cases concerning guns, transgender rights, online pornography, workplace discrimination and more are set to be heard ...
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".