Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Classical theism, while deeply influential in the development of Western religious thought, has been the subject of significant philosophical and theological critiques. These criticisms often center around the coherence of classical theism’s core attributes, especially in light of modern philosophical developments and alternative theistic models.
[3] [4] Atheism is commonly understood as non-acceptance or outright rejection of theism in the broadest sense of the term (i.e., non-acceptance or rejection of belief in God or gods). [5] [6] Related (but separate) is the claim that the existence of any deity is unknown or unknowable; a stance known as agnosticism.
Anthropology of religion; Comparative religion; History of religions; Philosophy of religion; Psychology of religion; Sociology of religion; Sometimes, theology and religious studies are seen as being in tension, [77] and at other times, they are held to coexist without serious tension. [78] Occasionally it is denied that there is as clear a ...
He argues that religion should be "reviewed as a strictly scientific question" and should be tested in the same way that other questions in science are examined. Based on his approach, Mill argues that monotheism is better than polytheism , although this does not necessarily mean that monotheism is more correct.
Theistic finitism, also known as finitistic theism or finite godism, is the belief in a deity that is limited. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] It has been proposed by some philosophers and theologians to solve the problem of evil .
In the Reformation and Counter-Reformation eras, Europe was a "persecuting society" which did not tolerate religious minorities or atheism. [4] Even in France, where the Edict of Nantes had been issued in 1598, then revoked in 1685, there was very little support for religious toleration at the beginning of the eighteenth century. [5]
Open theism, also known as openness theology, [1] is a theological movement that has developed within Christianity as a rejection of the synthesis of Greek philosophy and Christian theology. [2] It is a version of free will theism [ 3 ] and arises out of the free will theistic tradition of the church, which goes back to the early church fathers ...
According to him, this led to the development of religion, with the Woman and the Bull as the first sacred figures. [6] He claims that this led to a revolution in human thinking, with humans for the first time moving from animal or spirit worship to the worship of a supreme being , with humans clearly in hierarchical relation to it. [ 8 ]