When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: is this site reliable checker generator for sale

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. GPTZero - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPTZero

    GPTZero uses qualities it terms perplexity and burstiness to attempt determining if a passage was written by a AI. [14] According to the company, perplexity is how random the text in the sentence is, and whether the way the sentence is constructed is unusual or "surprising" for the application.

  3. List of fake news websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites

    Started in 2015, this fake news website is also designed to look like a local television outlet. Several of the website's fake stories have successfully spread on social media. Has the same IP address as Action News 3. [25] [316] [317] [312] [308] [309] TheRacketReport.com TheRacketReport.com Per PolitiFact. Has the same IP address as Action ...

  4. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    International Fact-Checking Network launched in 2015 by the Poynter Institute set a code of ethics for fact-checking organizations. The IFCN reviews fact-checkers for compliance with its code, and issues a certification to publishers who pass the audit.

  5. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Reliable scholarship – Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable, where the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses.

  7. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    [96] This was due to it becoming "an active fact-checker and anti-fringe", [97] with "pro-fringe editors" leaving the site as the Wikipedia community changed its interpretation of the NPOV policy and began to more accurately label misleading content as pseudoscience, conspiracy theory, etc., in harmony with the citations used to source that ...