When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insanity Defense Reform Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_Defense_Reform_Act

    The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 (IDRA) was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on October 12, 1984, [1] amending the United States federal laws governing defendants with mental diseases or defects to make it significantly more difficult to obtain a verdict of not guilty only by reason of insanity.

  3. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

    United States federal laws governing offenders with mental diseases or defects (18 U.S.C. §§ 4241–4248) provide for the evaluation and handling of defendants who are suspected of having mental diseases or defects.

  4. 1983 Texas Longhorns football team - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Texas_Longhorns...

    The 1983 Texas Longhorns football team represented the University of Texas at Austin in the 1983 NCAA Division I-A football season. The Longhorns finished the regular season with an 11–0 record and lost to Georgia in the Cotton Bowl Classic.

  5. Jones v. United States (1983) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._United_States_(1983)

    Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court, for the first time, addressed whether the due process requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment allows defendants, who were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) of a misdemeanor crime, to be involuntarily confined to a mental institution until such times as they are no longer a danger ...

  6. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    After the perpetrator of President Reagan's assassination attempt was found not guilty by reason of insanity, Congress passed the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984. Under this act, the burden of proof was shifted from the prosecution to the defense and the standard of evidence in federal trials was increased from a preponderance of evidence ...

  7. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    The House of Lords delivered the following exposition of the rules: . the jurors ought to be told in all cases that every man is to be presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to their satisfaction; and that to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the ...

  8. The coming Social Security fight could be 1983 all over again

    www.aol.com/finance/coming-social-security-fight...

    By 1983 the issue was unavoidable. The Greenspan Commission finished its work — with many final negotiations taking place at Baker's house — and produced a plan that passed Congress and Reagan ...

  9. John Hinckley Jr. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hinckley_Jr.

    [39]: 1487 n.76 In addition to restricting eligibility for the defense, many of these reforms shifted the burden of proof to the defendant. [41] For the first time, Congress passed a law stipulating the insanity test to be used in all federal criminal trials, the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984. [42]