Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act (French: Loi sur la protection des jeunes contre l’exposition à la pornographie), commonly known as Bill S-210, and formerly as Bill S-203, [10] is a Senate public bill introduced by Senator Julie Miville-Dechêne in the 44th Canadian Parliament.
The same survey found that 68 percent of Canadians, in general, supported a law similar to Bill 62 in their part of Canada. [25] A 2017 Angus Reid Institute poll found that 70 percent of Canadians outside of Quebec supported "legislation similar to Bill 62" where they lived in the country, with 30 percent opposing it.
As of May 2017, the service is available in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., and 95% of the U.S. population has access to 211 services by dialing 211 on a landline or cell phone. [6] In 2017, the 211 network answered close to 15 million requests for assistance by phone, text, and chat.
On 27 May 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved of a new blood donor history questionnaire for general use by blood establishments, which is compatible with the deferral for 12 months. [211] Before this update, the approved questionnaires were compatible only with an indefinite deferral of blood donations from MSM.
In 2015, then-Senator Wilfred Moore of the Senate of Canada introduced Bill S-203. At the time of its introduction, only two facilities kept live cetaceans in Canada. Marineland of Canada kept beluga whales, dolphins and a killer whale, and Vancouver Aquarium kept one killer whale. Both Marineland and the Vancouver Aquarium opposed the bill.
With the Act to amend the Charter of the French language, S.Q. 1988, c. 54 (also known as Bill 178), the National Assembly (under a Quebec Liberal government) made use of the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian constitution and amended the Charter by allowing English provided that the letters are no larger than half the size of the French.
In R. v. Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society the Supreme Court of Canada found that an open-ended statute (prohibiting companies from "unduly" lessening competition) was not a breach of Section 11(a). In R. v. Delaronde (1997), the Supreme Court of Canada found section 11 (a) is meant not only to guarantee a fair trial but also to serve as an ...
Where bills C-1 and S-1 differ in wording, this is indicated with angle brackets as follows: C-1 wording / S-1 wording . Whereas the introduction of a pro forma bill in the House of Commons / Senate before the consideration of the Speech from the Throne demonstrates the right of the elected representatives of the people / Senate to act without the leave of the Crown;