Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The functional area analysis identifies operational tasks, conditions and standards needed to accomplish objectives. The Functional Needs Analysis assesses the ability of current and programmed capabilities to accomplish the tasks identified in the functional area analysis. The end product of these first two levels of analysis is a list of ...
The Army's Force management model [3]: diagram on p.559 begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.
Air Force Logistics Management Agency (AFLMA) Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base, Alabama: Air Force Manpower Analysis Agency (AFMAA) JBSA-Randolph, Texas: Air Force Medical Readiness Agency (AFMRA) Falls Church, Virginia: Air Force Mortuary Affairs Operations (AFMAO) Dover Air Force Base, Delaware Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI)
The Air Force Manpower Analysis Agency (AFMAA) is a Field Operating Agency of the United States Air Force (USAF). It was reactivated in 2015 after inactivation in 2012 [ 1 ] at Joint Base San Antonio and was assigned directly to Hq, USAF.
The Aldridge study called for the establishment of a new joint lexicon that would allow leaders to clearly discuss mission areas and how to most responsibly manage resources. Further information on JCAs can be found at the Joint Experimentation, Transformation and Concepts Division (JETCD) [1] of the Joint Staff J-7, Operational Plans and Joint ...
Joint Assistant for Development and Execution (JADE) is a U.S. military system used for planning the deployment of military forces in crisis situations. [1]The U.S. military developed this automated planning software system in order to expedite the creation of the detailed planning needed to deploy military forces for a military operation.
J8 – Capability and Resource Integration: Conducts force management and analysis to include integrating, coordinating, prioritizing, and advocating USSTRATCOM future concepts, mission capability needs, weapons system development, support for emerging technologies, and command and control architecture across the mission areas.
In general, the IMP is a top-down planning tool and the IMS as the bottom-up execution tool. The IMS is a scheduling tool for management control of program progression, not for cost collection purposes. [10] An IMS would seek general consistency and a standardized approach to project planning, scheduling and analysis.