Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
It can only choose a new state, the result of following the transition. A pushdown automaton (PDA) differs from a finite state machine in two ways: It can use the top of the stack to decide which transition to take. It can manipulate the stack as part of performing a transition. A pushdown automaton reads a given input string from left to right.
The () parser is a deterministic pushdown automaton with the ability to peek on the next input symbols without reading. This peek capability can be emulated by storing the lookahead buffer contents in the finite state space, since both buffer and input alphabet are finite in size.
Nested words over the alphabet = {,, …,} can be encoded into "ordinary" words over the tagged alphabet ^, in which each symbol a from Σ has three tagged counterparts: the symbol a for encoding a call position in a nested word labelled with a, the symbol a for encoding a return position labelled with a, and finally the symbol a itself for representing an internal position labelled with a.
The two are not equivalent for the deterministic pushdown automaton (although they are for the non-deterministic pushdown automaton). The languages accepted by empty stack are those languages that are accepted by final state and are prefix-free: no word in the language is the prefix of another word in the language. [2] [3]
An embedded pushdown automaton or EPDA is a computational model for parsing languages generated by tree-adjoining grammars (TAGs). It is similar to the context-free grammar-parsing pushdown automaton, but instead of using a plain stack to store symbols, it has a stack of iterated stacks that store symbols, giving TAGs a generative capacity between context-free and context-sensitive grammars ...
Regular languages are a category of languages (sometimes termed Chomsky Type 3) which can be matched by a state machine (more specifically, by a deterministic finite automaton or a nondeterministic finite automaton) constructed from a regular expression. In particular, a regular language can match constructs like "A follows B", "Either A or B ...
The halting problem for a register machine: a finite-state automaton with no inputs and two counters that can be incremented, decremented, and tested for zero. Universality of a nondeterministic pushdown automaton: determining whether all words are accepted. The problem whether a tag system halts.
This conversion can be used to prove that every context-free language can be accepted by a real-time (non-deterministic) pushdown automaton, i.e., the automaton reads a letter from its input every step. Given a grammar in GNF and a derivable string in the grammar with length n, any top-down parser will halt at depth n.