When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: who hires walmart delivery drivers make at autozone open today

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Consumer protection agency sues Walmart, Branch alleging ...

    www.aol.com/consumer-protection-agency-sues...

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has sued Walmart and work scheduling platform Branch Messenger for allegedly forcing delivery drivers that are part of the discounter's gig program to use ...

  3. Walmart accused of illegally opening costly accounts for drivers

    www.aol.com/walmart-accused-illegally-opening...

    More than one million delivery drivers collectively paid more than $10 million in fees after Walmart and Branch Messenger illegally opened costly deposit accounts in their names without consent ...

  4. Walmart Partners With Home Depot on Direct Deliveries of ...

    www.aol.com/walmart-partners-home-depot-direct...

    Deliveries are made by independent workers who use Walmart’s delivery platform Spark Driver. Because Walmart is so ubiquitous in the U.S., it should have an edge over other third-party delivery ...

  5. AutoZone - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AutoZone

    AutoZone, Inc. is an American retailer of aftermarket automotive parts and accessories, the largest in the United States. Founded in 1979, AutoZone has 7,140 stores across the United States, Mexico , Puerto Rico , Brazil , and the US Virgin Islands .

  6. Gig worker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gig_worker

    Gig work is spreading around the side job and delivery business. Kakao has hired drivers to build a system for proxy driving, and the people of delivery are meeting the surging demand for delivery through a near-field delivery called "Vamin Connect". There is a gig work platform for professional freelancers, not just work.

  7. Juarez v. AutoZone Stores, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juarez_v._AutoZone_Stores...

    Juarez v. AutoZone Stores, Inc., Case No. 08-CV-00417-WVG (S.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2014), was a court case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California which is believed to be the largest single-plaintiff employment verdict in United States history at $185,872,719.52.