Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Reed v. Town of Gilbert , 576 U.S. 155 (2015), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when municipalities may impose content-based restrictions on signage. The case also clarified the level of constitutional scrutiny that should be applied to content-based restrictions on speech.
The district court selected to review the matter under intermediate scrutiny based on Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego, rather than the strict scrutiny content-based standard of Reed v. Town of Gilbert, as the off-premise versus on-premise standard was content-neutral.
Kavanaugh agreed with the Fourth Circuit's reasoning that the 2015 amendment was a content-based restriction that should be judged by strict scrutiny, as per Reed v. Town of Gilbert, [6] and that it failed to pass the strict scrutiny test. [7] [8] Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in concurrence.
Language links are at the top of the page across from the title.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans , 576 U.S. 200 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that license plates are government speech and are consequently more easily regulated/subjected to content restrictions than private speech under the First Amendment .
Get breaking news and the latest headlines on business, entertainment, politics, world news, tech, sports, videos and much more from AOL
On January 26, 2009, Ginsburg wrote for a unanimous court in Arizona v. Johnson that a police officer may pat down an individual at a traffic stop provided reasonable suspicion by the officer the individual was armed and dangerous. [126] In her opinion, Ginsburg concluded that the "combined thrust" of past opinions such as Terry v. Ohio and ...