When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook,_Inc._v._Duguid

    The Court found that under a statutory interpretation of the TCPA, the dialing system used by Facebook did not qualify as an "automatic telephone dialing system", and stated that only systems that "have the capacity either to store a telephone number using a random or sequential number generator", or that "produce a telephone number using a ...

  3. Hot Lotto fraud scandal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Lotto_fraud_scandal

    The Hot Lotto fraud scandal was a lottery-rigging scandal in the United States. It came to light in 2017, after Eddie Raymond Tipton (born 1963), [1] the former information security director of the Multi-State Lottery Association (MUSL), confessed to rigging a random number generator that he and two others used in multiple cases of fraud against state lotteries.

  4. Michael Cohen used AI tool to generate bogus cases in court ...

    www.aol.com/michael-cohen-used-ai-tool-185355794...

    Michael Cohen used AI tool to generate bogus cases in court filing. Oliver O'Connell. December 29, 2023 at 1:53 PM. Michael Cohen, ...

  5. Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_Consumer...

    Duguid (2021), the Court established that for a device to qualify as an "automatic telephone dialing system", it must be based on the capacity to store or produce numbers from a random or sequential generator. The case ruled that an automatic system that may phone a user from a stored number but otherwise not generated in a random or sequential ...

  6. Biggest court cases of 2025: From Diddy and Luigi ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/biggest-court-cases-2025-diddy...

    Sean "Diddy" Combs cases. Sean "Diddy" Combs — founder of Bad Boy Records and the Sean John brand — is due to stand trial in federal court in Manhattan on May 5 on a sex-trafficking indictment ...

  7. Bartenwerfer v. Buckley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartenwerfer_v._Buckley

    Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U.S. 69 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that debts incurred by fraud cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, regardless of whether the debtor committed the fraud.

  8. Template:Infobox court case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_Court_Case

    If this case is an appeal, name the court from which the appeal immediately came. Link the name if possible. If the case at the lower court has its own article, that case can be linked in parentheses after the name of the court. More complicated or longer histories can use the prior actions field alongside this field or instead of it. String ...

  9. Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_US...

    This field can contain citations to prior decisions in the case, in trial court or lower appellate courts, or prior decisions by the subject court; these should be preceded by a two to four word description of the ruling—this (together with the subsequent history, following) is merely the bare bones procedural history of the case—what ...