Ads
related to: should paraphrases be cited- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Grammar Checker
Check your grammar in seconds.
Feel confident in your writing.
- Free Writing Assistant
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Free Punctuation Checker
Fix punctuation and spelling.
Find errors instantly.
- Free Citation Generator
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The copied material should not be a substantial portion of the work being quoted and a long quotation should not be used where a shorter quotation would express the same information. What constitutes a substantial portion depends on many factors, such as the length of the original work, and the importance and relevance of the quoted text to ...
Cited elsewhere in the article: If the article mentions the fact repeatedly, it suffices to cite it once. Uncontroversial content in the lead section is often not cited, as it is a generalization of the cited body text. Subleads (generalized opening statements summarizing specific sections, paragraphs, etc.) may also be verified by the ...
Quotations must always have inline citations (see WP:When to cite), and quotations of biased statements of opinion should have in-text attribution. With direct quotation, editors should clearly distinguish the quoted material from the original text of the article following the guidelines for quotations. Extensive use of quotation from non-free ...
Basing substantial sections of article text on close paraphrases of one or several sources is improper, even if you cite the sources. When writing articles, you should generally use your own words and sentences, without copying your sources' sentence and paragraph structure, diction and style.
The {} template can be used to cite works whose metadata is held in Wikidata, provided the cited work meets Wikipedia's standards. As of December 2020, {{ Cite Q }} does not support "last, first" or Vancouver-style author name lists, so it should not be used in articles in which "last, first" or Vancouver-style author names are the dominant ...
Essays, proposals and information pages should only be cited as opinions or advice, not admonishment. They should not be used as an end-run around the Wikipedia process of establishing consensus . It is not a good idea to quote essays— including this one —as though they are Wikipedia-approved policies or guidelines .
For the cite tool, see Special:Cite, or follow the "Cite this page" link in the toolbox on the left of the page in the article you wish to cite. The following examples assume you are citing the Wikipedia article on Plagiarism , using the version that was submitted on July 22, 2004, at 10:55 UTC , and that you retrieved the article on August 10 ...
Multiple low quality citations following a statement does not make it more true. Over-citing content especially for non-controversial claims should be avoided. Editors have cited Citation overkill as a reason for adding additional citations after each sentence for non-controversial claims.
Ad
related to: should paraphrases be cited