Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Feedback such as "nice article" is not helpful. Point out any issues with the article that need to be addressed, but also mention what the editor has done well. An example of good feedback would be "Your article is well-structured, and I'm impressed with your use of images. Well done! However, some statements in the article are biased.
A Request for Comments (RFC) is a publication in a series from the principal technical development and standards-setting bodies for the Internet, most prominently the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). [1][2] An RFC is authored by individuals or groups of engineers and computer scientists in the form of a memorandum describing methods ...
Wikipedia:Guide to requesting assistance. This is a guide on how to effectively request assistance from other editors. (See Help:Contents for information about where to ask for assistance.) This page in a nutshell: You are more likely to obtain help from administrators and other editors if your request is brief, informative, and easily readable ...
The first step is to write the best initial proposal you can. Authors can request early-stage feedback at Wikipedia's village pump for idea incubation and from any relevant WikiProjects. Amendments to a proposal can be discussed on its talk page. It is crucial to improve a proposal in response to feedback received from outside editors.
feedback. About. article feedback. Article feedback was found at the bottom of many Wikipedia articles; it is a simple form that readers can use to submit suggestions for improvement. (See screenshot below.) These suggestions are then reviewed by Wikipedia contributors, who can identify and take action on useful feedback -- while ignoring or ...
WP:RFF is a place where feedback on articles can be requested via a peer review process. These articles may already be in the main encyclopaedia, or they may still be in draft form in user space. A requests for feedback on an article is normally submitted by its creator, although it is possible for other users to seek feedback on an article at RFF.
Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on. Compared to the real-world peer review process ...
The feedback form starts with a simple questions, then offers a comment box. The feedback form is a blue box at the bottom of Wikipedia articles, with a simple question: "Did you find what you were looking for?” and a comments box (see example above). For now, it is only available on a small test sample on the English Wikipedia.