When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: nissan frontier reviews consumer reports

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 2022 Nissan Frontier Review | Autoblog - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2022-nissan-frontier-review...

    Nissan should make a new midsize truck more often. Turns out, the company is good at it. Waiting 17 years for a new Frontier is a rather unforgivable period of time — yes, the last time we had a ...

  3. The most (and least) reliable cars of 2023 ranked - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/more-money-most-least...

    When it comes to product reviews, Consumer Reports is the gold standard. Gathering data from 300,000 vehicles from 2000-2023, CR’s team of engineers, journalists, researchers and scientists has ...

  4. Nissan Frontier (North America) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Frontier_(North...

    The Nissan Frontier is a nameplate used by Nissan in several regions as an alternative to the Navara and NP300 nameplates. In North America, the nameplate was used from 1997 to 2021, replacing the Hardbody. Since 2021, the Frontier sold in the US and Canada has been a separate model distinct from the globally marketed Navara/Frontier.

  5. Nissan Frontier - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Frontier

    The Nissan Frontier is a nameplate used on two different pickup truck models by Nissan: Nissan Frontier (international) , an alternative nameplate for the NP300/Navara on some markets Nissan Frontier (North America) , a rebadged NP300/Navara from 1997 to 2021, then became a separate model since 2021

  6. List of Nissan vehicles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nissan_vehicles

    Originally a renamed Navara, since the D41 model the North American-market Frontier is a standalone model. NT100 Clipper: ... 1941–1952 Nissan 180 Truck (based on ...

  7. List of automobiles known for negative reception - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automobiles_known...

    It remains one of the worst vehicles Consumer Reports has ever tested. [40] The publication noted that the car took 37.5 seconds to go from 0–60 MPH, it was dangerously structurally deficient in a 30MPH crash test with a standard car, and its bumpers were "virtually useless against anything more formidable than a watermelon ", all of which ...