When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: is wikipedia actually bad for mental health articles

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Reavley et al. (2012) compared the quality of articles on select mental health topics on Wikipedia with corresponding articles in Encyclopædia Britannica and a psychiatry textbook. They asked experts to rate article content with regard to accuracy, up-to-dateness, breadth of coverage, referencing and readability.

  3. Health information on Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_information_on...

    Health-related articles on Wikipedia are popularly accessed as results from search engines, which frequently deliver links to Wikipedia articles. [1] Independent assessments have been made of the number and demographics of people who seek health information on Wikipedia , the scope of health information on Wikipedia, and the quality and ...

  4. Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is...

    Non-sensical articles. Wikipedia has a large number of articles which could be considered rather irrelevant for something billing itself as an encyclopedia, such as "teh" (a misspelling of the word "the"), List of films that most frequently use the word "fuck", Goatse (an Internet shock site), Toilets in Japan, and The Flowers of Romance ...

  5. List of Wikipedia controversies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia...

    John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, the site has faced several controversies. Wikipedia's open-editing model, under which anyone can edit most articles, has led to concerns ...

  6. Criticism of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 28 December 2024. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...

  7. Wikipedia : Featured article review/Digital media use and ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article...

    The cited to several literature reviews and meta-analyses on the issue of mental health and digital media use, including several reviews on then-current debates in the field of global mental health and categorization of mental health disorders. I agree with you that to get the article back up to FA, a lot of OR cruft would need to be cut and ...

  8. Wikipedia : Academic studies of health information on Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_studies...

    This is a list of academic articles related to the coverage of health and medical topics on Wikipedia. For general academic articles see Academic studies of Wikipedia. For academic studies about the use of Wikipedia in education, see Academic studies of Wikipedia in education.

  9. Wikipedia:List of bad article ideas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_bad...

    Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, or, the list of article ideas that are really, really really bad; so bad that administrators are allowed to delete them on the spot. Wikipedia:Fart; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, list of "prohibited" items Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia:Starting an article