When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: some unique topics for argument

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Topics (Aristotle) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topics_(Aristotle)

    In his treatise Topics, Aristotle does not explicitly define topic, though it is "at least primarily a strategy for argument not infrequently justified or explained by a principle". [2] He characterises it in the Rhetoric [3] thus: "I call the same thing element and topic; for an element or a topic is a heading under which many enthymemes fall."

  3. Competitive debate in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competitive_debate_in_the...

    In the 1980s, a new argument called a "kritik" was introduced to intercollegiate debate. [24] Kritiks are a unique type of argument that argue "that there is a harm created by the assumption created or used by the other side"—that is, there is some other issue that must be addressed before the topic can be debated.

  4. Public forum debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_forum_debate

    Parliamentary debate is much less structured than PF, and participants are not made aware of their topics until 15–20 minutes before their round, giving them little time to research, gather evidence, and prepare their arguments. [11] In Public Forum, topics are decided prior the month starting, giving debaters plenty of time to research and ...

  5. Glossary of policy debate terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_policy_debate...

    Post-fiat arguments attempt to show that the consequences of passing and enacting the affirmative plan would be in some way worse than the harms described by the affirmative. Such arguments are labelled post-fiat because they require the supposition of a world where the plan is passed and implemented. This sort of argument is no different from ...

  6. Argumentation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory

    This, he believed, will ensure it stands up to criticism and earns a favourable verdict. In The Uses of Argument (1958), Toulmin proposed a layout containing six interrelated components for analyzing arguments: Claim (Conclusion) A conclusion whose merit must be established. In argumentative essays, it may be called the thesis. [23]

  7. Argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

    Some herbivores are zebras. Therefore, some people are zebras. Invalid argument, as it is possible that the premises be true and the conclusion false. In the above second to last case (Some men are hawkers ...), the counter-example follows the same logical form as the previous argument, (Premise 1: "Some X are Y." Premise 2: "Some Y are Z."

  8. Stock issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_issues

    The Nullification argument is also known as "plan eats resolution", in which some part or instance or iteration of the plan nullifies the resolution entirely, having shifted away from the resolution. This type of argument allows for only partial Inherency and partial Topicality, challenging total Significance.

  9. Logic of argumentation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_of_Argumentation

    In LA, arguments for and arguments against a proposition are distinct; an argument for a proposition contributes nothing to the case against it, and vice versa. Among other things, this means that LA can support contradiction – proof that an argument is true and that it is false. Arguments supporting the case for and arguments supporting the ...