Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A. A luta continua; A total and unmitigated defeat; Acceptable level of violence; All men are created equal; America can't do a damn thing against us; And I don't care what it is
The following is a chronological list of political catchphrases throughout the history of the United States government. This is not necessarily a list of historical quotes, but phrases that have been commonly referenced or repeated within various political contexts.
Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance is a 1985 book on everyday forms of rural class conflict as illustrated in a Malaysian village, written by anthropologist James C. Scott and published by Yale University Press.
Scroll through to find out what Trump and ten more of the world's most powerful people have to say about ambition, command, and leadership. Melissa Stanger contributed to an earlier version of ...
Political ethics (also known as political morality or public ethics) is the practice of making moral judgments about political action and political agents. [1] It covers two areas: the ethics of process (or the ethics of office), which covers public officials and their methods, [2] [3] and the ethics of policy (or ethics and public policy), which concerns judgments surrounding policies and laws.
The idea, though not the wording, has been attributed to the History of the Peloponnesian War, written around 410 BC by the ancient historian Thucydides, who stated that "right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." [7]
The Azzam Pasha quotation was part of a statement made by Abdul Rahman Hassan Azzam, the Secretary-General of the Arab League from 1945 to 1952, in which he declared in 1947 that, were a war to take place with the proposed establishment of a Jewish state, it would lead to "a war of extermination and momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacre and the Crusades."
Classical realism originally explained the machinations of international politics as being based on human nature and therefore subject to the ego and emotion of world leaders. [5] Neorealist thinkers instead propose that structural constraints—not strategy, egoism , or motivation—will determine behavior in international relations.