When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Instructions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than ...

  3. Wikipedia : Template index/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Verifiability_and_sources

    This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous

  4. Wikipedia:Template index/Sources of articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Sources_of_articles

    Issues with sources: this is for tagging issues with sources; they are either inline tags, or message boxes for sections or entire pages. You could also leave a note on the talk page asking for a source, or move the material to the talk page and ask for a source there.

  5. Wikipedia:New page patrol source guide - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_page_patrol...

    The purpose of this page is to centralize information about reliable sources for use by new page reviewers when reviewing new articles. It is intended as a supplement to the reliable sources noticeboard and perennial sources list, to help page reviewers unfamiliar with a given subject assess notability and neutrality of an article––entries should focus on whether a specific publication is ...

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RSN

    The perennial sources list is intended for sources that we've repeatedly identified actual problems with, and despite their concerning ownership (classification as generally reliable doesn't preclude WP:WEIGHT) the discussion to classify them here feels preemptive.

  7. Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people.

  8. Template:Unreliable sources section - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Unreliable...

    This template alerts people to an article section containing encyclopedic content which appears to rely on unreliable sources. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers block formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Month and year date As with most cleanup templates, the date= parameter sorts the article into subcategories of Category:Articles lacking ...

  9. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed. (December 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)