When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Unfair dismissal in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_dismissal_in_the...

    Assuming the employee has proven dismissal, the first stage is to establish what was the reason for dismissal, e.g. was it a potentially fair reason or an automatically unfair reason. [3] The burden of proof for this is on the employer. [4] If the employer pleads a potentially fair reason, the burden is on him to prove it. [5]

  3. Employment Rights Act 1996 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Rights_Act_1996

    The reasons laid out that an employer can dismiss are in s.98(2). Fair reasons to dismiss an employee are if it, (a) relates to the capability or qualifications of the employee for performing work of the kind which he or she was employed by the employer to do, (b) relates to the conduct of the employee, (c) is that the employee was redundant, or

  4. Taylor v Connex South Eastern Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v_Connex_South...

    35 It seems to us abundantly clear that, as the subject matter of the insistence by the Respondent's on the contractual change was an important term which had been transferred across on the occasion of the transfer from British Rail to Connex South Eastern, then the dismissal of Mr Taylor by reason of his refusal to accept that change was a ...

  5. Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polkey_v_AE_Dayton...

    Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1987] UKHL 8 is a UK labour law case, concerning unfair dismissal, now governed by the Employment Rights Act 1996.. The phrase 'Polkey deduction' has become a standard concept in UK Employment Tribunals, as a result of this case and later ones, meaning that even if a Tribunal decides a dismissal was unfair, it must separately decide whether the compensatory ...

  6. Redundancy in United Kingdom law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundancy_in_United...

    Section 139 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 defines the two situations in which a redundancy may occur: (a) the fact that his employer has ceased or intends to cease— (i) to carry on the business for the purposes of which the employee was employed by him, or (ii) to carry on that business in the place where the employee was so employed, or

  7. Abernethy v Mott, Hay and Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abernethy_v_Mott,_Hay_and...

    The wrong label of 'redundancy' does not affect the point. The second point is whether the reason here was such as to justify the dismissal. Under section 24(2)(a) a reason would be sufficient if it 'related to the capability or qualifications of the employee for performing work of the kind which he was employed by the employer to do.'

  8. Starbucks largely loses appeal over baristas' firing in NLRB case

    www.aol.com/news/starbucks-largely-loses-appeal...

    A federal appeals court on Friday largely rejected Starbucks' appeal of a National Labor Relations Board finding the coffee chain illegally fired two Philadelphia baristas because they wanted to ...

  9. Termination of employment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_of_employment

    A less severe form of involuntary termination is often referred to as a layoff (also redundancy or being made redundant in British English). A layoff is usually not strictly related to personal performance but instead due to economic cycles or the company's need to restructure itself, the firm itself going out of business, or a change in the function of the employer (for example, a certain ...