Ad
related to: are subheadings bolded in mla citation meaning definition
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Text formatting in citations should follow, consistently within an article, an established citation style or system. Options include either of Wikipedia's own template-based Citation Style 1 and Citation Style 2, and any other well-recognized citation system. Parameters in the citation templates should be accurate.
In the bolded text typically appearing at the opening of an article: Any quotation marks that are part of the title should be in bold just like the rest of the title. From "A" Is for Alibi: "A" Is for Alibi is a mystery novel ... Quotation marks not part of the article title should not be bolded. From Jabberwocky: "Jabberwocky" is a nonsense ...
Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require ...
By contrast, a bold font weight makes letters of a text thicker than the surrounding text. [2] Bold strongly stands out from regular text, and is often used to highlight keywords important to the text's content. For example, printed dictionaries often use boldface for their keywords, and the names of entries can conventionally be marked in bold ...
Full citations to sources, if short citations are used in the footnotes; General references (full bibliographic citations to sources that were consulted in writing the article but that are not explicitly connected to any specific material in the article) Editors may use any citation method they choose, but it should be consistent within an article.
The formatting of the notes sets a bad example because it doesn't follow what the article recommends. I understand that using examples helps to define text formatting, but starting off with precisely the sort of thing we are attempting to avoid doesn't seem wise. I'd leave the examples for the body of the article and use a more standard hatnote:
MLA Style Manual, formerly titled MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing in its second (1998) and third edition (2008), was an academic style guide by the United States–based Modern Language Association of America (MLA) first published in 1985. MLA announced in April 2015 that the publication would be discontinued: the third ...
By a longstanding convention formalized in the Manual of Style, an article's title is typically repeated at the opening of the article's first sentence (in bold) usually followed by is or was and a definition. However, this practice is not mandatory and should be followed only where it lends natural structure to the sentence.