When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of regular expression engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_regular...

    Fuzzy Regular Expressions for Java: Java: LGPL GLib/GRegex [Note 3] GLib reference manual: C: LGPL GNU regex Gnulib reference manual: C LGPL GNU libc, GNU programs GRETA Microsoft Research: C++ Proprietary Gregex: Grovf Inc. RTL, HLS Proprietary: FPGA accelerated >100 Gbit/s regex engine for cybersecurity, financial, e-commerce industries ...

  3. Comparison of parser generators - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Comparison_of_parser_generators

    Regular languages are a category of languages (sometimes termed Chomsky Type 3) which can be matched by a state machine (more specifically, by a deterministic finite automaton or a nondeterministic finite automaton) constructed from a regular expression. In particular, a regular language can match constructs like "A follows B", "Either A or B ...

  4. re2c - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re2c

    It compiles declarative regular expression specifications to deterministic finite automata. Originally written by Peter Bumbulis and described in his paper, [1] re2c was put in public domain and has been since maintained by volunteers. [3] It is the lexer generator adopted by projects such as PHP, [4] SpamAssassin, [5] Ninja build system [6] and

  5. Regular expression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression

    Regular expressions are used in search engines, in search and replace dialogs of word processors and text editors, in text processing utilities such as sed and AWK, and in lexical analysis. Regular expressions are supported in many programming languages. Library implementations are often called an "engine", [4] [5] and many of these are ...

  6. Ragel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragel

    Ragel's input is a regular expression only in the sense that it describes a regular language; it is usually not written in a concise regular expression, but written out into multiple parts like in Extended Backus–Naur form. For example, instead of supporting POSIX character classes in regex syntax, Ragel implements them as built-in production ...

  7. Tree-sitter (parser generator) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree-sitter_(parser_generator)

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file

  8. Thompson's construction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson's_construction

    To decide whether two given regular expressions describe the same language, each can be converted into an equivalent minimal deterministic finite automaton via Thompson's construction, powerset construction, and DFA minimization. If, and only if, the resulting automata agree up to renaming of states, the regular expressions' languages agree.

  9. RE/flex - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re/flex

    Besides the built-in RE/flex POSIX regex pattern matcher, RE/flex also supports PCRE2, Boost.Regex and std::regex pattern matching libraries. PCRE2 and Boost.Regex offer a richer regular expression pattern syntax with Perl pattern matching semantics, but are slower due to their intrinsic NFA-based matching algorithm.