When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Prior-appropriation water rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior-appropriation_water...

    Water is very scarce in the West and so must be allocated sparingly, based on the productivity of its use. The prior appropriation doctrine developed in the Western United States from Spanish (and later Mexican) civil law and differs from the riparian water rights that apply in the rest of the United States.

  3. Water law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_law_in_the_United_States

    Colorado, where the prior appropriation doctrine first developed, was generally looked to as the model by other Western states that adopted the prior appropriation doctrine. Water law in the western United States is defined by state constitutions (e.g., Colorado, New Mexico), statutes, and case law. Each state exhibits variations upon the basic ...

  4. Arizona v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._California

    Since then, the case has been relitigated several times because of Arizona's claims that California is using more water than it is entitled to. The court determined that the Secretary of the Interior was not bound by Prior-appropriation water rights in allocating water among the states, within the 1964 decree. [1]

  5. Water resources law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_resources_law

    The other major model is the prior appropriations model, the first party to make use of a water supply has the first rights to it, regardless of whether the property is near the water source. [6] Riparian systems are generally more common in areas where water is plentiful, while appropriations systems are more common in dry climates.

  6. Lux v. Haggin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lux_v._Haggin

    These two systems of water rights were at odds with one another. [2] [3] Appropriative water rights granted the first to claim the water's use complete rights to it. Riparian water rights established that use of the water was an uncontested right that came with the land and did not have to be shared with non-riparian land owners. The case of Lux v.

  7. McCarran Amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran_Amendment

    (a) Joinder of United States as defendant; costs Consent is given to join the United States as a defendant in any suit (1) for the adjudication of rights to the use of water of a river system or other source, or (2) for the administration of such rights, where it appears that the United States is the owner of or is in the process of acquiring water rights by appropriation under State law, by ...

  8. State’s approach to water rights is two-faced and ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/state-approach-water-rights-two...

    Adel Hagekhalil, general manager of Metropolitan Water District, was also recently quoted as saying a water management proposal should be implemented in a way that “does not devastate our $1.6 ...

  9. History of California water law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../History_of_California_water_law

    While the comparative lack of water was a central factor, since the 1980s academics have begun to highlight economic, social, and cultural forces that shaped Californian water law in the 1850s as well. [1] Water law's concept of prior appropriation was developed and refined over the course of the 15 year Gold Rush due to these factors. [1]