When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Self-Incrimination clause provides various protections against self-incrimination, including the right of an individual not to serve as a witness in a criminal case in which he or she is a defendant. "Pleading the Fifth" is a colloquial term often used to invoke the Self-Incrimination Clause when witnesses decline to answer questions where ...

  3. United States v. Hubbell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Hubbell

    (1) The Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination protects a witness from being compelled to disclose the existence of incriminating documents that the Government is unable to describe with reasonable particularity; and (2) Where the witness produces such documents pursuant to a grant of immunity, 18 U. S. C. §6002 ...

  4. Pennsylvania v. Muniz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._Muniz

    In the majority opinion, Justice Brennan started by discussing the 5th Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause, which says that no one “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” [10] This privilege against self-incrimination only protects a suspect from (a) being compelled to testify against himself or (b ...

  5. Salinas v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas

    Salinas v. Texas, 570 US 178 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which the court held 5-4 decision, declaring that the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause does not extend to defendants who simply choose to remain silent during questioning, even though no arrest has been made nor the Miranda rights read to a defendant.

  6. Spevack v. Klein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spevack_v._Klein

    Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967) was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the court held in a plurality decision that the Self-incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment applied even to attorneys in a state bar association under investigation, and an attorney asserting that right may not be disbarred for invoking it.

  7. Counselman v. Hitchcock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counselman_v._Hitchcock

    The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then adopted the broader "transactional immunity" rule. [1] [2]

  8. What does 'plead the Fifth' mean? Will Donald Trump do it? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/does-plead-fifth-mean-trumps...

    The ex-president's lawyer has indicated that he will advise Trump to stay mum and invoke the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ...

  9. Adamson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamson_v._California

    In the majority opinion written by Justice Stanley Forman Reed, the Supreme Court found that while Adamson's rights may have been violated had the case been tried in federal court, the rights guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment did not extend to state courts based on the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.