When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: differences between luke and acts

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Luke–Acts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LukeActs

    Luke is the longest of the four gospels and the longest book in the New Testament; together with Acts of the Apostles it makes up a two-volume work from the same author, called LukeActs. [5] The cornerstone of LukeActs' theology is "salvation history", the author's understanding that God's purpose is seen in the way he has acted, and will ...

  3. Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_the_Apostles

    However, scholars have noted differences between Luke and Acts, including some apparent contradictions. For example, the gospel seems to place the Ascension on Easter Sunday, shortly after the Resurrection, while Acts 1 puts it forty days later. [48] Such differences have led to debates over the nature of the unity between the two books.

  4. Authorship of Luke–Acts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_LukeActs

    The Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles make up a two-volume work which scholars call LukeActs. [1] The author is not named in either volume. [2] According to a Church tradition, first attested by Irenaeus (c. 130 – c. 202 AD), he was the Luke named as a companion of Paul in three of the Pauline letters, but many modern scholars have expressed doubt that the author of Luke-Acts ...

  5. Gospel of Luke - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Luke

    The Gospel of Luke [a] is the third of the New Testament's four canonical Gospels. It tells of the origins, birth, ministry, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus. [4] Together with the Acts of the Apostles, it makes up a two-volume work which scholars call LukeActs, [5] accounting for 27.5% of the New Testament. [6]

  6. Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    It has been claimed that the author of Acts used the writings of Josephus (specifically Antiquities of the Jews) as a historical source. [13] [14] The majority of scholars reject both this claim and the claim that Josephus borrowed from Acts, [15] [16] [17] arguing instead that Luke and Josephus drew on common traditions and historical sources.

  7. Four Evangelists - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Evangelists

    Luke the Evangelist, the author of the third gospel account (and the Acts of the Apostles), is symbolized by a winged ox or bull—a figure of sacrifice, service, and strength. Luke's account begins with the duties of Zechariah in the temple; it represents Jesus's sacrifice in his Passion and Crucifixion , as well as Christ being high priest ...

  8. Luke the Evangelist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke_the_Evangelist

    Whether Luke was a Jew or gentile, or something in between, it is clear from the quality of the Greek language used in Luke-Acts that the author, held in Christian tradition to be Luke, was one of the most highly educated of the authors of the New Testament. The author's conscious and intentional allusions and references to, and quotations of ...

  9. Ascension of Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascension_of_Jesus

    The ascension is detailed in both Luke and Acts, a pair of works ascribed to the same author, Luke the Evangelist: [14] [7] Luke 24:51 : Jesus leads the eleven remaining disciples to Bethany , a village on the Mount of Olives , and instructs them to remain in Jerusalem until the coming of the Holy Spirit : "And it came to pass, while he blessed ...