When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: doxpop court case

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's...

    Jim Obergefell, the lead plaintiff in the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges that ruled same-sex marriage bans unconstitutional, criticized Thomas, whose own interracial marriage required Loving v. Virginia in order to be recognized by all states, for urging the Court to revisit and overrule its prior decisions. [347]

  3. GirlsDoPorn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GirlsDoPorn

    [4] [3] In her own declaration filed in the civil case court, Nored stated that she had acted as a reference for five to seven women. [66] In November 2021, the U.S. Attorney's Office told the federal judge overseeing the criminal case that the sex trafficking charge against Amberlyn Dee Nored was being dismissed "to satisfy the ends of justice ...

  4. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._X...

    United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64 (1994), was a federal criminal prosecution filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles against X-Citement Video and its owner, Rubin Gottesman, on three charges of trafficking in child pornography, specifically videos featuring the underaged Traci Lords.

  5. Personal and business legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_and_business...

    [93] [94] [95] One of the defendant companies was owned by the Italian government, providing a basis for removing it to federal court, where the case was dismissed. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the dismissal in 1992, and the Supreme Court denied Trump's petition to hear the case in the same year. [96]

  6. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.

  7. Doe et al. v. Trump Corp. et al. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doe_et_al._v._Trump_Corp...

    Doe et al. v. Trump Corporation et al. is an ongoing case commenced in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York in October 2018, [3] [4] in which plaintiffs Lynn Chadwick, Markus Frazier, Catherine McKoy and Millard Williams [5] filed a previously anonymous lawsuit against the Trump Corporation, Donald Trump and three of his adult children — Donald Jr., Eric, and Ivanka ...