Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
On Wikipedia and other sites running on MediaWiki, Special:Random can be used to access a random article in the main namespace; this feature is useful as a tool to generate a random article. Depending on your browser, it's also possible to load a random page using a keyboard shortcut (in Firefox , Edge , and Chrome Alt-Shift + X ).
CS1 template for Interviews Template parameters [Edit template data] This template has custom formatting. Parameter Description Type Status Last name last last1 author Last name of the first interviewee String suggested First name first first1 First name of the first interviewee String suggested Subject link subject-link Wikipedia link to Subject (Interviewee) Page name optional Interviewer ...
For example, access-date is not required for links to copies of published research papers accessed via DOI or a published book, but should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites (these can change from time to time, even if they are also published in a physical medium).
A government green paper which raises a policy option and is meant to open a dialogue on the proposal is more similar in tone to a briefing note than is a white paper. A memo's concise format is relatively standardized in order to create accessibility to any reader. They open with a heading including a "to," "from," "date," and "subject".
Disambiguation pages and lists were not included in the sample. Data was gathered on the date of the first edit and November 2015 page views. Before any data could be gathered one article was deleted at AfD and another was merged. Both these articles were discarded from the sample. See User:Smallbones/1000 random for the full sample.
Examples by discipline The sources available to you in your undergraduate research could often be more accurately described as primary source surrogates. For example, instead of examining an individual's diary directly, you may find yourself using reproduced images of its pages—or, more likely yet, a typed transcription of its contents.
One (or at most a few) examples about the subject matter under discussion should suffice. Before adding a further example to an article, pause to ask yourself whether doing so would help readers unravel additional facets of the article subject, or if it would only be adding details specific to that example, without advancing the readers ...
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia — each article is meant to provide its readers with "a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject", from a neutral point of view. While Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research, nor an original synthesis of the research literature, you may do this on Wikipedia's sister projects.