When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ex parte - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte

    In Australian law ex parte is used in two senses. The predominant use is to refer to an ex parte hearing, being one which is heard in the absence of one or more parties. Where proceedings are heard ex parte, a high degree of candour is required, including full and fair disclosure of facts adverse to the moving party.

  3. Mitsuye Endo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsuye_Endo

    In Endo's case—Ex parte Mitsuye Endo—the court unanimously ruled on Dec. 18, 1944, that the government could not detain citizens who were loyal to the United States. The day before the ruling, hearing that the case would go against his Executive Order 9066 Pres. Roosevelt issued an order allowing Japanese Americans to return to the West Coast.

  4. Ex parte Endo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Endo

    Ex parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944), was a United States Supreme Court ex parte decision handed down on December 18, 1944, in which the Court unanimously ruled that the U.S. government could not continue to detain a citizen who was "concededly loyal" to the United States. [1]

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Ex parte Bain, 121 U.S. 1 (1887), overruled in part by United States v. ... Proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432 (1895)*

  6. Ex parte Merryman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Merryman

    Ex parte Merryman, 17 F. Cas. 144 (C.C.D. Md. 1861) (No. 9487), was a controversial U.S. federal court case that arose out of the American Civil War. [1] It was a test of the authority of the President to suspend "the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus " under the Constitution's Suspension Clause , when Congress was in recess and therefore ...

  7. Re Shankar Alan s/o Anant Kulkarni - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re_Shankar_Alan_s/o_Anant...

    The standard of proof for this test is the "balance of probabilities". [27] A drawing of Lady Justice. In R. v. Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy (1923), [28] the court said that "justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done". [29]

  8. R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte A

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Criminal_Injuries...

    R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte A was a 1999 case in the United Kingdom where a decision by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB) not to award compensation was quashed by the House of Lords as it was deemed to be a breach of the rules of natural justice.

  9. Subpoena duces tecum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpoena_duces_tecum

    A subpoena duces tecum (pronounced in English / s ə ˈ p iː n ə ˌ dj uː s iː z ˈ t iː k ə m / sə-PEE-nə DEW-seez TEE-kəm), or subpoena for production of evidence, is a court summons ordering the recipient to appear before the court and produce documents or other tangible evidence for use at a hearing or trial.