When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of fake news websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 9 March 2025. For satirical news, see List of satirical news websites. This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources. Fake news websites are those which intentionally, but not necessarily solely ...

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    As Arab News is closely associated with the Saudi Arabian government and is published in a country with low press freedom, editors consider Arab News biased and non-independent for Saudi Arabian politics, and recommend attribution for its coverage in this area. Some editors consider Arab News unreliable for matters related to the Saudi Arabian ...

  4. Ad Fontes Media - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_Fontes_Media

    Otero sees the Media Bias Chart as an "anchor" that counteracts political polarization in news media, and aspires for Ad Fontes to become a "Consumer Reports for media ratings". [5] She compared low-quality news sources to junk food, [12] and described sources with extreme bias as "very toxic and damaging to the country". [4]

  5. AllSides - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AllSides

    AllSides Technologies Inc. is an American company that estimates the perceived political bias of content on online written news outlets. AllSides presents different versions of similar news stories from sources it rates as being on the political right, left, and center, with a mission to show readers news outside their filter bubble and expose media bias. [2]

  6. Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

    Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. [1] It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets, [2] [3] relying on a self-described "combination of objective measures and subjective analysis".

  7. Media bias in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_bias_in_the_United...

    Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting released a 2003 study arguing that the network news disproportionately focused on pro-war sources (64%) and left out many anti-war sources (10%). The study stated that "viewers were more than six times as likely to see a pro-war source as one who was anti-war; with U.S. guests alone, the ratio increases to 25 to 1."

  8. Wikipedia:New pages patrol source guide - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol...

    Epistle News, an April 2020 discussion concluded that it is a small publication with no track record of use by independent sources. [362] Evolve Politics, essentially self-published, with significant bias as well [357] Lesbian and Gay News, , rough consensus in a March 2021 RSN discussion for unreliability, with a minority in dissent. Possibly ...

  9. Fake news websites in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news_websites_in_the...

    Fake news websites deliberately publish hoaxes, propaganda, and disinformation to drive web traffic inflamed by social media. [8] [9] [10] These sites are distinguished from news satire as fake news articles are usually fabricated to deliberately mislead readers, either for profit or more ambiguous reasons, such as disinformation campaigns.